Speech given by President Hugo Chavez at 60th UN General Assembly. New York, Thursday, September 15, 2005
Your Excellencies, friends, good afternoon:
The original purpose of this meeting has been completely distorted. The
imposed center of debate has been a so-called reform process that overshadows
the most urgent issues, what the peoples of the world claim with urgency: the
adoption of measures that deal with the real problems that block and sabotage
the efforts made by our countries for real development and life.
Five years after the Millennium Summit, the harsh reality is that the great
majority of estimated goals- which were very modest indeed- will not be
met.
We pretended reducing by half the 842 million hungry people by the year
2015. At the current rate that goal will be achieved by the year 2215. Who in
this audience will be there to celebrate it? That is only if the human race is
able to survive the destruction that threats our natural environment.
We had claimed the aspiration of achieving universal primary education by
the year 2015. At the current rate that goal will be reached after the year
2100. Let us prepare, then, to celebrate it.
Friends of the world, this takes us to a sad conclusion: The United Nations
has exhausted its model, and it is not all about reform. The XXI century claims
deep changes that will only be possible if a new organization is founded. This
UN does not work. We have to say it. It is the truth. These transformations --
the ones Venezuela is referring to-- have, according to us, two phases: The
immediate phase and the aspiration phase, a utopia. The first is framed by the
agreements that were signed in the old system. We do not run away from them. We
even bring concrete proposals in that model for the short term. But the dream
of an ever-lasting world peace, the dream of a world not ashamed by hunger,
disease, illiteracy, extreme necessity, needs-apart from roots- to spread its
wings to fly. We need to spread our wings and fly. We are aware of a
frightening neoliberal globalization, but there is also the reality of an
interconnected world that we have to face not as a problem but as a
challenge.
We could, on the basis of national realities, exchange knowledge, integrate
markets, interconnect, but at the same time we must understand that there are
problems that do not have a national solution: radioactive clouds, world oil
prices, diseases, warming of the planet or the hole in the ozone layer. These
are not domestic problems. As we stride toward a new United Nations model that
includes all of us when they talk about the people, we are bringing four
indispensable and urgent reform proposals to this Assembly: the first; the
expansion of the Security Council in its permanent categories as well as the
non permanent categories, thus allowing new developed and developing countries
as new permanent and non permanent categories. The second; we need to assure
the necessary improvement of the work methodology in order to increase
transparency, not to diminish it. The third; we need to immediately suppress-
we have said this repeatedly in Venezuela for the past six years- the veto in
the decisions taken by the Security Council, that elitist trace is incompatible
with democracy, incompatible with the principles of equality and democracy.
And the fourth; we need to strengthen the role of the Secretary General;
his/her political functions regarding preventive diplomacy, that role must be
consolidated. The seriousness of all problems calls for deep transformations.
Mere reforms are not enough to recover that “weâ€
all the peoples of the world are waiting for. More than just reforms we in
Venezuela call for the foundation of a new United Nations, or as the teacher of
Simon Bolivar, Simon Rodriguez said: “Either we invent or we
err.”
At the Porto Alegre World Social Forum last January different personalities
asked for the United Nations to move outside the United States if the repeated
violations to international rule of law continue. Today we know that there were
never any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The people of the United States
have always been very rigorous in demanding the truth to their leaders; the
people of the world demand the same thing. There were never any weapons of mass
destruction; however, Iraq was bombed, occupied and it is still occupied. All
this happened over the United Nations. That is why we propose this Assembly
that the United Nations should leave a country that does not respect the
resolutions taken by this same Assembly. Some proposals have pointed out to
Jerusalem as an international city as an alternative. The proposal is generous
enough to propose an answer to the current conflict affecting Palestine.
Nonetheless, it may have some characteristics that could make it very difficult
to become a reality. That is why we are bringing a proposal made by Simon
Bolivar, the great Liberator of the South, in 1815. Bolivar proposed then the
creation of an international city that would host the idea of unity.
We believe it is time to think about the creation of an international city
with its own sovereignty, with its own strength and morality to represent all
nations of the world. Such international city has to balance five centuries of
unbalance. The headquarters of the United Nations must be in the South.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are facing an unprecedented energy crisis in which
an unstoppable increase of energy is perilously reaching record highs, as well
as the incapacity of increase oil supply and the perspective of a decline in
the proven reserves of fuel worldwide. Oil is starting to become exhausted.
For the year 2020 the daily demand for oil will be 120 million barrels. Such
demand, even without counting future increments- would consume in 20 years what
humanity has used up to now. This means that more carbon dioxide will
inevitably be increased, thus warming our planet even more.
Hurricane Katrina has been a painful example of the cost of ignoring such
realities. The warming of the oceans is the fundamental factor behind the
demolishing increase in the strength of the hurricanes we have witnessed in the
last years. Let this occasion be an outlet to send our deepest condolences to
the people of the United States. Their people are brothers and sisters of all
of us in the Americas and the rest of the world.
It is unpractical and unethical to sacrifice the human race by appealing in
an insane manner the validity of a socioeconomic model that has a galloping
destructive capacity. It would be suicidal to spread it and impose it as an
infallible remedy for the evils which are caused precisely by them.
Not too long ago the President of the United States went to an Organization
of American States meeting to propose Latin America and the Caribbean to
increase market-oriented policies, open market policies-that is neoliberalism-
when it is precisely the fundamental cause of the great evils and the great
tragedies currently suffered by our people. : The neoliberal capitalism, the
Washington Consensus. All this has generated is a high degree of misery,
inequality and infinite tragedy for all the peoples on his continent.
What we need now more than ever Mr. President is a new international order.
Let us recall the United Nations General assembly in its sixth extraordinary
session period in 1974, 31 years ago, where a new International Economic Order
action plan was adopted, as well as the States Economic Rights and Duties
Charter by an overwhelming majority, 120 votes for the motion, 6 against and 10
abstentions. This was the period when voting was possible at the United
Nations. Now it is impossible to vote. Now they approve documents such as this
one which I denounce on behalf of Venezuela as null, void and illegitimate.
This document was approved violating the current laws of the United Nations.
This document is invalid! This document should be discussed; the Venezuelan
government will make it public. We cannot accept an open and shameless
dictatorship in the United Nations. These matters should be discussed and that
is why I petition my colleagues, heads of states and heads of governments, to
discuss it.
I just came from a meeting with President Nestor Kirchner and well, I was
pulling this document out; this document was handed out five minutes before-
and only in English- to our delegation. This document was approved by a
dictatorial hammer which I am here denouncing as illegal, null, void and
illegitimate.
Hear this, Mr. President: if we accept this, we are indeed lost. Let us turn
off the lights, close all doors and windows! That would be unbelievable: us
accepting a dictatorship here in this hall.
Now more than ever- we were saying- we need to retake ideas that were left
on the road such as the proposal approved at this Assembly in 1974 regarding a
New Economic International Order. Article 2 of that text confirms the right of
states to nationalizing the property and natural resources that belonged to
foreign investors. It also proposed to create cartels of raw material
producers. In the Resolution 3021, May, 1974, the Assembly expressed its will
to work with utmost urgency in the creation of a New Economic International
Order based on-- listen carefully, please--the equity, sovereign equality,
interdependence, common interest and cooperation among all states regardless of
their economic and social systems, correcting the inequalities and repairing
the injustices among developed and developing countries, thus assuring present
and future generations, peace, justice and a social and economic development
that grows at a sustainable rate.
The main goal of the New Economic International Order was to modify the old
economic order conceived at Breton Woods.
We the people now claim- this is the case of Venezuela- a new international
economic order. But it is also urgent a new international political order. Let
us not permit that a few countries try to reinterpret the principles of
International Law in order to impose new doctrines such as pre-emptive warfare.
Oh do they threaten us with that pre-emptive war! And what about the
Responsibility to Protect doctrine? We need to ask ourselves. Who is going
to protect us? How are they going to protect us?
I believe one of the countries that require protection is precisely the
United States. That was shown painfully with the tragedy caused by Hurricane
Katrina; they do not have a government that protects them from the announced
nature disasters, if we are going to talk about protecting each other; these
are very dangerous concepts that shape imperialism, interventionism as they try
to legalize the violation of the national sovereignty. The full respect towards
the principles of International Law and the United Nations Charter must be, Mr.
President, the keystone for international relations in today’s world and
the base for the new order we are currently proposing.
It is urgent to fight, in an efficient manner, international terrorism.
Nonetheless, we must not use it as an excuse to launch unjustified military
aggressions which violate international law. Such has been the doctrine
following September 11. Only a true and close cooperation and the end of the
double discourse that some countries of the North apply regarding terrorism,
could end this terrible calamity.
In just seven years of Bolivarian Revolution, the people of Venezuela can
claim important social and economic advances.
One million four hundred and six thousand Venezuelans learned to read and
write. We are 25 million total. And the country will-in a few days- be declared
illiteracy-free territory. And three million Venezuelans, who had always been
excluded because of poverty, are now part of primary, secondary and higher
studies.
Seventeen million Venezuelans-almost 70% of the population- are receiving,
and for the first time, universal healthcare, including the medicine, and in a
few years, all Venezuelans will have free access to an excellent healthcare
service. More than a million seven hundred tons of food are channeled to over
12 million people at subsidized prices, almost half the population. One million
gets them completely free, as they are in a transition period. More than 700
thousand new jobs have been created, thus reducing unemployment by 9 points.
All of this amid internal and external aggressions, including a coup d’
etat and an oil industry shutdown organized by Washington. Regardless of the
conspiracies, the lies spread by powerful media outlets, and the permanent
threat of the empire and its allies, they even call for the assassination of a
president. The only country where a person is able to call for the
assassination of a head of state is the United States. Such was the case of a
Reverend called Pat Robertson, very close to the White House: He called for my
assassination and he is a free person. That is international terrorism!
We will fight for Venezuela, for Latin American integration and the world.
We reaffirm our infinite faith in humankind. We are thirsty for peace and
justice in order to survive as species. Simon Bolivar, founding father of our
country and guide of our revolution swore to never allow his hands to be idle
or his soul to rest until he had broken the shackles which bound us to the
empire. Now is the time to not allow our hands to be idle or our souls to rest
until we save humanity.
Translated by Nestor Sanchez
http://www.embavenez-us.org